From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 27 Aug 93 20:44:49 GMT From: nih-csl!epr0.niehs.nih.gov!duling@uunet.uu.net (David R Duling) Subject: Re: Cross compilers, anyone? Message-ID: List-Id: In article hildjj@jupiter.fuentez.co m (Joe Hildebrand) writes: >From: hildjj@jupiter.fuentez.com (Joe Hildebrand) >Subject: Re: Cross compilers, anyone? >Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1993 14:23:56 GMT >>> In article >>> on comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc Ian Kemmish writes: >says no one from the NT camp has asked for gcc to be ported. Is >anyone out there interested in a FREE compiler for NT that can >cross-compile to 100+ different machine architectures and does C, C++, >Objective C, and Ada? yes. I am and Im sure many others would be interested in a gcc for NT. > Richard> to the original poster. I will be doing a GCC port to the > Richard> DEC Alpha version of NT as soon as DEC can get such a > Richard> machine to me. A port to NT on a PowerPC should also not > Richard> be very far away, since we're starting to do the > Richard> modifications to the RS/6000 configuration files to > Richard> support the various Motorola chips that are > Richard> implementations of the PowerPC architecture. > Richard> As far as I know, no one is working on a GCC port to > Richard> Windows NT on an x86. The x86 work lately seems to be too bad. Not even close to the scope of my job. But thanks for the post. - Dave >---------- >Joe Hildebrand Fuentez Systems Concepts >hildjj@fuentez.com 11781 Lee-Jackson Hwy, Suite 700 >Software Engineer Fairfax, VA 22033 > Phone: (703)273-1447 > Fax: (703)273-2972 >Standard disclaimers apply