From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT equivalent to gcc's #warning directive?
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 09:05:39 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <dtro9hFg8hhU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <c2ed036d-79d4-4a06-aaa4-213e96b77dd5@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net YePxDdrCbx2fFQlHVyazZwzT5praXkkjLcwsdnUAUO6o086e0h
Cancel-Lock: sha1:r4Unqjxd9wbNcIax69AkHHosAg8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
In-Reply-To: <c2ed036d-79d4-4a06-aaa4-213e96b77dd5@googlegroups.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31011
Date: 2016-07-03T09:05:39+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16-07-03 04:01 , Warren wrote:
> I vaguely recall there was a gnat pragma to cause the compiler to
> spit out a user defined message. In C++ I often insert a cpp #warning
> when I need to go back and revisit some code. That way it nags me
> every time I build the project, until it gets addressed.
>
> I'm looking for something similar in gnat. I thought it was pragma
> Warnings(), but that appears to be for known compiler warnings.

Compile_Time_Warning:

http://docs.adacore.com/gnat_rm-docs/html/gnat_rm/gnat_rm/implementation_defined_pragmas.html#pragma-compile-time-warning


-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
       .      @       .