From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 05:31:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!deine.net!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!not-for-mail From: Dale Stanbrough Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada paper critic References: <3D095F70.8090001@telepath.com> <3D09A3D9.FCFE2426@sympatico.ca> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:31:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.91.90 X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1024057893 144.132.91.90 (Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:31:33 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:31:33 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25937 Date: 2002-06-14T12:31:33+00:00 List-Id: David Marceau wrote: > > > > ...and doesn't the representation of holey enumerated types cause > > a lot of run time processing? > I don't remember seeing anything in the ada95 rationale or the reference > manual mentioning > "minimize run-time processing" as part of the ada language design > intent. Interesting, but that's not what the original question was. The person was wondering what features of Ada caused it to run slow (i'm not sure what the exact wording was). I'm answering his question. > That's interesting IMHO these all ADA FEATURES and not ada bugs :) ok. Dale