From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d60e0492375aa57a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-14 02:53:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.esat.net!colt.net!deine.net!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!not-for-mail From: Dale Stanbrough Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages?? References: <3d47a99e.4548109@news.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:53:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.42.132 X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1029318821 144.132.42.132 (Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:53:41 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:53:41 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28014 Date: 2002-08-14T09:53:41+00:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > Yes, AI-262, "private with". Already approved by the ARG. The example > would be written in Ada 0Y as: > > private package a.b is > type hidden is > end a.b; > > private with a.b; > package a.c is > type not_hidden is private; > private > type not_hidden is new a.b.hidden; > end; > > Randy Brukardt Excellent! Time to drag out some old programs. Does anyone know if any compiler vendors have implemented this yet? (and more significantly for me, has Gnat implemented it?). I tried it out on the Mac port (which calls itself GNAT 5.00w) but it objected. Dale