From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fba93c19bb4e7dbd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-18 02:12:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!yellow.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Dale Stanbrough Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Q: Endless loop by dispatching References: <3F0ED2C8.6080409@snafu.de> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:10:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.41.43 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1058519435 144.132.41.43 (Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:10:35 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:10:35 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40459 Date: 2003-07-18T09:10:35+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > > It is also related to an ability to explicitly specify that a > > subroutine is an overriding, not overloading, to avoid undesired > > overloading in case ot typo errors. I do not know whether there is an > > AI on that. If yes, they should be considered together. > > Yes, there is such an AI. Does it cover the opposite where due to a typo you haven't overridden a subprogram? Dale