From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ae1a0032f54059 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-09 04:21:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!intgwlon.nntp.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!not-for-mail From: Dale Stanbrough Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs Interfaces.C types References: <20030109014828.1ba9cb7a.david@realityrift.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:21:46 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.47.50 X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1042114906 144.132.47.50 (Thu, 09 Jan 2003 23:21:46 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 23:21:46 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32813 Date: 2003-01-09T12:21:46+00:00 List-Id: In article <20030109014828.1ba9cb7a.david@realityrift.com>, David Holm wrote: > Hi, > are the following safe to assume? > > Interfaces.C.unsigned = Integer > Interfaces.C.short = Short_Integer > Interfaces.C.C_Float = Float > Interfaces.C.double = Long_Float I think that gnat is based on this assumption, but of course that is only one compiler. Dale