From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bae62a394f8c9d83 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!news.germany.com!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!not-for-mail From: Szymon Guz Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada binding Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:05:58 +0100 Organization: ATMAN Message-ID: References: <1142859.ZZbdis6YEU@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: staticline10528.toya.net.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: node3.news.atman.pl 1139508372 12958 85.89.162.21 (9 Feb 2006 18:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@atman.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 18:06:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <1142859.ZZbdis6YEU@linux1.krischik.com> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2825 Date: 2006-02-09T19:05:58+01:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik napisa=B3(a): > Szymon Guz wrote: >=20 >> Maciej Sobczak napisa?(a): >>> Szymon Guz wrote: >>> >>>> how to make an Ada binding for a "C++" class using this C layer ? >>> Basically, if the C++ class is not a template, but just plain "classi= c" >>> OO stuff, then you can write a wrapper around it in C, which will sti= ll >>> be OO, but without the syntax sugar of real class. Something along th= is: >>> >>> // an existing C++ class: >>> class MyClass >>> { >>> public: >>> void myFun(); >>> }; >>> >>> // a C wrapper: >>> extern "C" >>> void * MyClass_new() >>> { >>> return new MyClass; >>> } >>> >>> extern "C" >>> void MyClass_delete(void *p) >>> { >>> delete static_cast(p); >>> } >>> >>> extern "C" >>> void MyClass_myFun(void *vp) >>> { >>> MyClass *mcp =3D static_cast(vp); >>> mcp->myFun(); >>> } >>> >>> // and so on. >>> >>> Depending on the level of isolation that you want to achieve and the >>> level of type safety that you want to retain, hiding the object behin= d >>> void* might or might not be the best choice, but this is to give you = the >>> idea. Above, MyClass_new, MyClass_delete and MyClass_myFun are plain = C >>> functions (you can extract their declarations to separate header file= ) >>> and you can interface them from just about any sensible language in >>> existence and from Ada in particular. >>> >>> >> OK, but what about using the class fields : >> >> class MyClass >> { >> public: >> int X; >> int *p_X; >> } >> >> and what about inheriting this from the class in Ada, is it possible ?= >=20 > If you are planning to inheriting then you need to directly bind to th= e C++ > class. Only one compiler offers that (GNAT). Start reading here: >=20 > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.2/gnat_rm/Pragma-CPP_005fClass.ht= ml >=20 > Martin I know but I wander if I can do that using other compilers and with the=20 middle layer written in C. regards Szymon Guz