From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 18 Aug 93 19:09:14 GMT
From: cc.gatech.edu!terminus!drewd@gatech.edu  (L. Drew Davis)
Subject: Re: ADA's worthiness (was Re: Godowski on Noah's Ark
Message-ID: <drewd.745700954@cc.gatech.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

jmeritt@mental.mitre.org writes:

>Ted Holden writes:
>>some worthless programming language like Ada

>Well, maybe Ada DOES have one thing in favor of it!  If Ted is against it,
>it may be good.
 
   Like all languages, it has its good points and bad points.  Ted's
probably upset that the "accept" statement isn't specified to
be unconditional for Velikovskian rendezvous.
 
--------------
L. Drew Davis                   Internet: drewd@cc.gatech.edu
uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt5645c
It's not so much the Apocalypse as the humidity.