From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: egarrulo Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Object Pascal vs Ada -- which is better for a hobbyist? Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:31:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net W/CWmSZCnS5m4pX4xpzdGgu6o7IeCwqeVREZ7omXlyViupnky6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:nQsf34prX6vvlc7oHqowMst5ju8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29772 Date: 2016-03-15T11:31:47+01:00 List-Id: On 15/03/16 11:23, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > It is difficult to judge what is better for hobbyists. All depends on > the background of concrete people. But usually people interested in > cross-compilers are less inclined to IDEs and more to raw hacking. I agree that the background of people is what matters the most but, in general, I think that whatever is easier to use is better for hobbyists. Object Pascal was designed for RAD, therefore it prioritized ease of use, and so did its IDEs. Ada had different design goals, which make Ada more difficult for hobbyists.