From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c7b0b777188b7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!134.158.69.22.MISMATCH!in2p3.fr!irazu.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!cernne03.cern.ch!cern.ch!news From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:47:41 +0200 Organization: CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics Message-ID: References: <1128499462.850353.146890@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87ek6zom2h.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87ek697ga5.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> <435e99ee$0$23939$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1130321538.366226.26460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <4360b346$0$22526$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1130476216.365009.9090@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43620890$0$22541$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: abpc10883.cern.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sunnews.cern.ch 1130500061 4983 (None) 137.138.37.241 X-Complaints-To: news@sunnews.cern.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Red Hat/1.7.12-1.1.3.2.SL3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <43620890$0$22541$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6031 Date: 2005-10-28T13:47:41+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > The C++ compiler also has a history of issues... not stopping > a release. > Why is it considered good enough in spite of the issues? > I guess that's the meaning of "good enough"? I guess that for any product there exists an arbitrary meaning of "good enough" that can prevent it from being released, ever. The version of GNAT that I got with my Linux distribution allows me to overflow the Integer type without any exceptions at run time (and I can also define my own range and overflow it without error). I guess that with some chosen meaning of "good enough" this compiler would not be released. -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/