From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1073c2,db15d2f6cb54705a X-Google-Attributes: gid1073c2,public X-Google-Thread: 101deb,db15d2f6cb54705a X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,db15d2f6cb54705a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,db15d2f6cb54705a X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: f8131,e2c196a85919d5cc X-Google-Attributes: gidf8131,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,db15d2f6cb54705a X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-28 17:51:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!netnews.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!bad-news.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!POSTED.monger.newsread.com!not-for-mail From: "Gary Labowitz" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.vrml,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.asm370 References: Subject: Re: S/390 (was Market pressures for more reliable software) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:52:25 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.16.156.238 X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 993775945 207.16.156.238 (Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:52:25 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:52:25 EDT Organization: ENTER.net (enter.net) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9228 comp.lang.java.programmer:79489 comp.lang.pl1:1163 comp.lang.vrml:3942 comp.lang.java.advocacy:22210 comp.lang.asm370:1079 Date: 2001-06-29T00:52:25+00:00 List-Id: What's even more amazing is that I can recall a number of the op codes. Gary "Roedy Green" wrote in message news:fcgnjt4ft33trc0qvudsii54todsmt2e9u@4ax.com... > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:17:43 GMT, robin > wrote or quoted : > > >But when the second address is zero, it does not branch, and > >the address of the next instruction is placed in the nominated > >register. (e.g., BALR 3,0) > > > It is quite amazing that people can still remember this stuff. I have > not used it since the 70s. > > > For more detail, please look up the key words mentioned in this post in > the Java Glossary at: http://mindprod.com/gloss.html > > -- > Roedy Green, Canadian Mind Products > Custom computer programming since 1963. Ready to take on new work.