From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd5a3253b56eb233
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.osn.de!diablo1-ffm.news.osn.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL - Anonymous Access Type
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:44:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Message-ID: <dhijce$afd$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
References: <1127850090.283075.268920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <v4tkj198rmhpa5d3a3hpo1bads3a4a5gp0@4ax.com>
   <433a753d$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
   <k8nnj1pqh7maohqn8cucuema2ce9nfl37j@4ax.com>
   <1128015110.761667.17940@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <dhhaqq$1hq$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
 <1128026379.476018.305260@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host86-131-205-90.range86-131.btcentralplus.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com 1128059086 10733 86.131.205.90
 (30 Sep 2005 05:44:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:44:46 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1128026379.476018.305260@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5295
Date: 2005-09-30T05:44:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Anh Vo wrote:
> Martin Dowie wrote:
> 
>>Anh Vo wrote:
>>
>>>I agree since the new package Ada.Real_Time.Execution_Time does not
>>>exist yet.
>>
>>I have a version of this that works for ObjectAda on Windows if anyone
>>would like it...
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>-- Martin
> 
> 
> Did you mean that ObjectAda on Windows has implemented Ada 2005 syntax.
> If it is true, yes I would like get my hand on it. Thanks.

No, I mean that I have an implementation for 
Ada.Real_Time.Execution_Time for ObjectAda for Windows.

Cheers

-- Martin