From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.248.8 with SMTP id yi8mr44761852pac.26.1415907821810; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.214.34 with SMTP id nx2mr32618obc.17.1415907821672; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hl2no1334414igb.0!news-out.google.com!ks2ni19241igb.0!nntp.google.com!r10no2400799igi.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:43:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2602:306:3784:5b10:ecd3:efd4:1985:d704; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:3784:5b10:ecd3:efd4:1985:d704 References: <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <1415776387.7960.41.camel@obry.net> <4b21e212-7744-433a-a939-a82ef63ce8cc@googlegroups.com> <1415791954.7960.59.camel@obry.net> <2c66b776-777b-4530-a1a3-21337cefab85@googlegroups.com> <1ac854d1-36b7-4d06-b673-ad25cdb71736@googlegroups.com> <26c926cb-c011-4add-9639-f5c09acf8337@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? From: David Botton Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:43:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23240 Date: 2014-11-13T11:43:40-08:00 List-Id: > I agree with this. It seems like in some circles gcc is seen as > yesterday's technology. I'd worry more about LLVM taking over the world. About time someone get the fire to Finish the work already started (and was working) for porting the GNAT front end to LLVM or write a new one :) I'm a bit busy ;) I have a good excuse. David Botton