From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.105.4 with SMTP id e4mr8029244ywc.53.1467213324459; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.45.136 with SMTP id g8mr186358otb.3.1467213324421; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!jk6no6531486igb.0!news-out.google.com!o189ni10879ith.0!nntp.google.com!jk6no6531484igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58a8d469-d09b-4f52-a25f-c95862f8bd10@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=104.129.204.69; posting-account=Go6kmQoAAACKWg_6T5TjAYpv4OMGyXMt NNTP-Posting-Host: 104.129.204.69 References: <1478546537.486959448.307219.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <8d02d76b-c4e7-4185-8e90-e43b9fd984fd@googlegroups.com> <6012c0d1-15e8-41a8-8321-3294194cb000@googlegroups.com> <0afa35d1-176a-4891-97ea-058d4742234f@googlegroups.com> <0285b222-f01a-47d3-9866-967b16f44efa@googlegroups.com> <58a8d469-d09b-4f52-a25f-c95862f8bd10@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: any free blog site in ada ? like livejournal but less ads? From: endlessboomcapitalism@gmail.com Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:15:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30967 Date: 2016-06-29T08:15:24-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 9:14:58 PM UTC-4, David Botton wrote: > Gnoga everything is always stateful and dynamic, problem is abstracted away. That is the awesomeness of Gnoga. You write for the web like you would for a multi-user desktop app. > > Ok, no 100% true, because you _could_ write your app in an old style web fashion (in fact that is the purpose of the Gnoga blog example, it shows you how you _could_ do that, not per se that you should). > > David Botton I have not done a desktop app. What does it mean to write in desktop app style? Is this simpler I am guessing that web stuff? How long would you say someone to learn ada programming if now know only bash well. No programming in real language experience? I think I saw a learn ada now site for learning.