From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful Date: 1998/08/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 381668184 References: <902934874.2099.0.nnrp-10.c246a717@news.demon.co.uk> <6r1e1a$mj$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6r631r$5ph$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 903280033 20721 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: JPR says <> Kindly then, please do so, we know the principles, the point is the example. You posted a program that was syntactically incorrect, and also contained a fundamental semantic error. It is not so easy asyou think to avoid the flag here, please try -- don't just say you can do it without proving it!