From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe4dfa1b8acdbe4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: gnat310p on NT
Date: 1998/08/14
Message-ID: <dewar.903137455@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 381276612
References: <01bdc744$cef04bc0$0e2915c0@w95>
 <0QXRrq2x9GA.123@samson.airnet.net> <6r1f6i$9q6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 903137550 20464 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-08-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

T.E.D. said

<<I thought gnat didn't do separates. Has this changed?
>>

Of course GNAT "does separates". The proper processing of subunits
is required by the RM, and so of course GNAT handles them. Furthermore
GNAT guarantees that, unlike the case with many Ada compilers, there is
never any runtime efficiency penalty from making a subprogram or package
into a subunit.