From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful? Date: 1998/08/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 381008440 References: <6qg3on$kjq$2@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <6qrdn4$4ac@drn.newsguy.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 903074831 17606 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: iJoe says <> Actually this thread has little to do with Ada vsw XXX, and most certainly Robert Eachus' post was not about this. It was instead about the difference in styles between do-it-right-first-time and hack-around-and-make-it-right-later. Yes, of course there can be huge differences in productivity between programmers, but I suspect an awful lot of people are not workiing in the manner that is most efficient for them. If writing correct code first time, without needing to do lots of debugging and testing, seems an unachievable ideal, then perhaps you should experiemtn with your style a little and give this apporoach a try, you may surprise yourself!