From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c0437014cb20f71 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: System.Address_to_Access_Conversions Date: 1998/07/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 375136705 References: <6odddl$k94$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35AB9C59.74E529E0@magic.fr> <6ofn8e$5ff$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6ofqvs$alm@hacgate2.hac.com> <6ogieq$qlo@drn.newsguy.com> <6pes7b$f88@drn.newsguy.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 901493066 14821 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew said <> Not even that is true, as I pointed out, this paper is ancient at this stage, and cannot even be taken as a necessarily accurate description of GNAT as it exists today.