From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,133de21eb82605b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: How do functions return unbounded arrays? Date: 1998/06/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 364717366 References: <358444BA.757121D8@cl.cam.ac.uk> <1998061518584100.OAA28557@ladder01.news.aol.com> <35865075.9D7DCBD@cl.cam.ac.uk> <6m80o6$9st$1@erlang.praxis-cs.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 898439794 16364 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-06-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Gavin said <> That is really an Ada 83 comment (SPARK is still somewhat Ada 83 oriented!) In Ada 95, it is a requirement of the language that & on string literals (actually more accurately on static string expressions -- a useful extension not permitted as far as I remember by SPARK) are required to be handled statically.