From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e4280c6ade7eb23 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Exception types? Date: 1998/06/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 364717358 References: <3584F47B.3ADF7442@elca-matrix.ch> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 898438961 16107 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-06-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Mats said <> I think this limitation is quite reasonable, given the intended use, which is simply to pass a short identifying message along. It is of course trivial to eliminate this limitation in an implementation, but only at the expense of implicit heap use, which is generally undesirable. (especially if the exception in question is Storage_Error!)