From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,56dbd715fa74735a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Mutually dependent private types Date: 1998/06/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 359661514 References: <6k25ra$6j7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3565B105.9BFB4788@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> <356B226F.EF05E927@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> <356C8A02.44354B09@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> <356E09A1.B493FE89@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> <356F8561.A863216A@acenet.com.au> <6kp02d$of5$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <3572E5F6.C8D8549C@ac3i.dseg.ti.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 897004772 23865 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-06-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <<> >How does a compiler that uses a non source based compilation library > >"with" a package that hasn't been compiled yet? > >(i.e. would allowing circular dependencies introduce a big headache > >for just about every Ada compiler, except for Gnat?) >> Just to correct a misimpression here, GNAT is not the only Ada compiler to use the source-based compilation library, all Ada compilers based on the Intermetrics front end (Aonix, Green-Hills, ...) also share this approach.