From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,db76fe2b02c25dcc
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,db76fe2b02c25dcc
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,db76fe2b02c25dcc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT binding error and circular dependancy HELP!!!
Date: 1998/05/24
Message-ID: <dewar.896041505@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 356140992
References: <6k9o1i$qmf$1@plug.news.pipex.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 896041641 31406 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc,gnu.gcc.help
Date: 1998-05-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<Is there a way to switch off the circular dependancy checking so I can bind
as there are no elaboration problems in the code that it would generate.
>>


You should read the chapter on elaboration issues in the GNAT users guide.
It should answer all the questions you have in this area.

te that by default, GNAT uses a static check for elaboration order which
is (of course) over-conservative.