From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c89fe49fff7f5b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: IRQs and interrupt handlers Date: 1998/05/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 355834418 References: <356307C7.D18D062@cl.cam.ac.uk> <6k1rq4$58t@top.mitre.org> <1998May21.173539.1@eisner> <3565976A.D1B53EA9@catalina-inter.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 895929840 30724 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Chris says <> This is nothing to do with GNAT. Anything that can be done in this regard can most certainly be done using GNAT, since this is not a language dependent issue at all. Some glue code may be needed at some level, in writing the necessary device drivers, which could for example be done with package Machine_Code, or alternatively this may well be a case in which a mixed Ada-C approach would make sense. Certainly there is no feature that needs adding to GNAT to support this! I would certainly be opposed to adding some Win-95 specific rubbish to Ada or GNAT. We will let Mr. Gates do that if he ever feels that universal use of Ada is threatening the ability of Microsoft to lock out non-MS users :-)