From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7fd5a5da28dace78 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Renaming Fixed Point Mutiplicative operator in Ada 95 Date: 1998/05/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 355353916 References: <3561F32B.2F0B@innotts.co.uk> <01bd84c3$47215d60$440029a1@m00rq900> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 895785832 8218 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-05-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Incidentally, in a critical system, I would jolly well hope that EITHER a) you prove that division by zero cannot happen or b) you test for it explicitly if z = 0 then .... else a := y /z; end if; Once again, I think this is way overblown. Incidentally, I find that having the convention be that the compiler generates run time checks but you do NOT permit exception handlers to be a diabolical one. Sounds like another Ariane on the way. WHo on earth came up with that brilliant designed-to- cause-trouble decision! It is that decision that is causing you heartburn, and not surprisingly so, rather than anything to do with redefining division!