From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85e8c53792269cfd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada and UNICODE?
Date: 1998/05/19
Message-ID: <dewar.895624271@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 354800718
References: <355CA32B.7B77@erols.com> <dewar.895283044@merv>
 <35606616.0@news4.his.com> <dewar.895560795@merv>
 <8790nxooru.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 895624334 24417 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-05-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ronald said

<<Probably won't happen.  The Japanese don't like the "han-unification"
in Unicode or UTF-x.  The O'Reilly book, "Understanding Japanese
Information Processing," covers the subject in good detail.
>>

Indeed! The Koreans are not very enthusiastic about this unification
either. However ... no one ever thought that the unification could succeed
at all, let alone the unification with unicode, and it did, so who knows
maybe we can make more progress here than one might guess!