From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114669,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid114669,public X-Google-Thread: 1147fc,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid1147fc,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: ADA on the super Date: 1998/04/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 345257237 References: <6h7v0c$r68$1@bambi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 892872659 12984 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.sys.super,comp.parallel.mpi,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Alex, amidst a number of rather peculiar ramblings mentions <> Just so that this does not result in more misinformation spreading, this is to remind that of *course* GNAT is a native code compiler and not a "preprocessor" whatever that might mean (best guess is that Alex falls into the common misconception of assuming that GNAT translates from Ada to C).