From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6fb0eff797e41c12 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Dynamic Instantiation in Ada95 ? Date: 1998/04/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 345013948 References: <01BD6867.17421990.Matthias.Oltmanns@so.sema.de> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 892816651 23174 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Interesting point! Have a look at the GNAT sources here to understand the situation. You will see that there is indeed some implementation dependent magic here. You cannot implement S'Class'Input staying strictly within the language.