From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9f89faeb8f41ad0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: ifdef replacement for GNAT Date: 1998/04/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 342411204 References: <352287EE.1CFB@tolstoy.mdc.com> <352B8208.41C6@tolstoy.mdc.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 892128483 30673 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John said <> I have no idea what "not as transparent as the C preprocessor" means, but note that gnatprep, unlike the C preprocessor, understands Ada tokens and will pass through arbitrary Ada text without difficulties, unlike the C preprocessor which will choke on some constructs (such as attributes) because they do not look like C tokens.