From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b736111afc6e20ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Embedded Processor/Compiler Selection Date: 1998/02/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 328189365 References: <98022313125408@psavax.pwfl.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 888332350 8708 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Marin said << If this is the case, there's some credible reasons to believe that it is unsuitable for (at least hard) real time systems. (see: http://www.realtime-info.be/encyc/market/rtos/ntspecial.htm) Maybe Windows CE has corrected these problems? >> No, that's a misunderstanding. Windows CE is indeed intended for hard real time embedded applications. Look for example at the recent newsstory on its adoption for a multi-million unit High-definition cable TV gizmo. Actually the story is hot news, because MS is desperately trying to get people NOT to adopt the new HDTV standard, and instead adopt the (inferior from a TV point of view) PC standard, and these new cable boxes will not properly accomodate HDTV, but that is not, I think beccause of any *technical* limitation in Windows CE. Whether CE is a reasonable Ada target from a business point of view is quite another matter ...