From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b05f12bd7a2a871
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Lexical Conundrum
Date: 1998/02/23
Message-ID: <dewar.888252366@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 327883706
References: <01bd3d80$101287c0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
 <EotBMK.MnK@world.std.com> <dewar.888209206@merv> <Eou91J.Es9@world.std.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 888252531 7651 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Keywords: parsing; ambiguity
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Bob Duff said

<<I was just pointing out that the RM doesn't require a separator between
a reserved word and a character_lit, not between a reserved word and a
tick mark.  This is different from the rule in some other languages, as
kst points out in another message.
>>

I assume not in the second line here should be nor ...

True, but this does not *resolve* the issue that the original post raised,
it *causes* this issue to appear -- a bit of a difference!!!!