From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff77d39cbf08efe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: [Q] GNAT and SGI IPC
Date: 1998/02/21
Message-ID: <dewar.888116931@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 327416609
References: <34eeb0a2.550787@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 888117109 24414 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


John asks

<<Hi,

Quick question that should hopefully get a yes or no answer.

Do SGI IRIX systems support POSIX.4 Message Queues and if so, does
GNAT for SGI provide bindings to the library calls?

Thanks


Best Regards
John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk>
>>

Actually a simple yes/no answer is not straightforward, since you do not
say what version of GNAT you are using:

  The SGI product version
  The ACT prodcut version
  The public version

The answers are different depending ...