From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b37ee187e035b961 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: LZW Date: 1998/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 326109276 References: <6ca326$f0g$1@news4.isdnet.net> <34ea2f93.1444559@news.onramp.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 887776249 24430 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> What on earth is the point of translating the C to Ada in a case like this? Why not simply interface to the C code. Sounds like a lot of work that (a) achieves nothing and (b) substantially increases the risks.