From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c54bb73b6fd8d22
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GDB Woes Continued...
Date: 1998/02/02
Message-ID: <dewar.886461587@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 321497482
References: <6b50fl$knt@lotho.delphi.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 886461715 27471 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


tmoran said

<<  Did your Ada system give source code walkbacks on unhandled
exceptions, or (in Ada 95) in Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Information?
I find *much* less usage of the debugger now that I have those.
>>

That's most definitely the case, and certainly I find that in practice
I often only use GDB to get this symbolic traceback, and it is enough.