From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a441a9594e85d08
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Bignum modular types in Ada95
Date: 1998/02/01
Message-ID: <dewar.886367046@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 321162805
References: <34CE568C.55D7E23D@cl.cam.ac.uk> <34CF3E78.F816DB5@cl.cam.ac.uk>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 886367196 22338 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<Would any of the major compiler designers (especially the
GNAT team) be interested in add such bignum support to their
compiler? I think, this would be a very nice distinguishing
feature over the competition and over C/C++/Java compilers!
>>

I am not sure why you think GNAT customers might be especially interested
in such a capability, but so far we have seen zero demand from our customers
for such a feature, so there is no interest so far.