From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9b2ad3cac4d4266 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Low level (GNAT) Ada? Date: 1998/01/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 318316247 References: <34C48A74.26CA@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> <885450093.13snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 885475954 23218 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-01-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Actually the issue is less using a DOS compiler, than using a DOS operating system, i.e. no operating system at all. Basically DOS is a program loader that lets you load programs into a bare board environment, and Jerry is quite right, if you want to mess with low level stuff like IO ports, you don't *want* an operating system around at all! (and if you do want to work with an OS, you are definitely in the device driver area -- this is actually true with DOS also, if you want to "fit in" to what little is there, you should also write a DOS device driver.