From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55a5f36014a8c16c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: IDE for GNAT/Linux?
Date: 1998/01/20
Message-ID: <dewar.885320660@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 317742682
References: <34B95DD8.415C2599@altoetting-online.de>
 <34BC0A6E.8CDD593@altoetting-online.de>
 <01bd2202$a756bb40$95fc82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
 <34c29f47.7713059@news.altoetting-online.de> <6a2bj5$mnp@top.mitre.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 885320822 926 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Michael said (I guess he has another agenda item):

<<The conversion of text editor (no graphics or mouse) to
word processor in the above conversation not only shows
a common practice, but a common predjudice against the
handicapped who cannot use a mouse.
>>

This really rates a huh?

There are text editors which use mouses

There are word processors which do not use mouses

What a completely extraordinary distinction to try to make!