From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fef6d36568070b0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Losts packages.. Date: 1997/12/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 310322324 References: <67mq0s$dlo$1@orthanc.reference.com> <67nbsm$13p$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 883153638 22252 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-12-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> To be fair, the great majority of Ada 83 compilers, even today, did NOT make this (non-upwards compatible) change to type Character. WG9 permitted the change, partly as a transitional aid for the transition to Ada 95, but it was neither the expectation or even the desirable aim that all Ada 83 compilers should have taken advantage of this move.