From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e02731064e80d04
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada - State of the art tools... lacking
Date: 1997/12/24
Message-ID: <dewar.882984450@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 309942324
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Organization: New York University
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 882984567 4023 (None) 128.122.140.58
References: <01bd102d$fcfbb910$652da8c0@steved_home>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
Date: 1997-12-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


SteveD says

<<Neither system makes it through a build on the first attempt.  Both
ObjectAda and GNAT complain about errors in individual source files.  In
both systems I compile the files with errors individually and then rebuild
and then they suceed.
>>

If both GNAT and ObjectAda agree that something peculiar is going on with
some of your files, it is most likely pilot error on your part, or a
misunderstanding of some crucial Ada 95 issue (e.g. disappearence of
optional packages). You might want to give some details here!