From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,183ebe04e93f0506 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: fixed point vs floating point Date: 1997/12/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 295113585 References: <3484D37E.E68@nospam.flash.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 881244877 27591 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Joe said <> I am really puzzled by this response. Joe said there were problems back then. Fine, I wanted to find out what they were, doesn't seem like an attack to me! But I must say, my attempt to get more detail on Joe's claims have been entirely in vain, not for want of trying. It is fine for people to complain that they had problems because of incorrect implementation of fixed-point in early compilers, but only if that really is the case, and I was dubious. I must say this entire discussion has not removed the doubt I have that this claim is real. I know Ada fixed-point pretty well, and I have followed its use quite closely. I am aware of some difficulties in implementations, particularly restrictions on non-binary small values, but I must say I am not aware of any difficulties that would correspond to Joe's vague recollections, so given Joe's inability to recall any details at all, I am inclined to think that the best guess is that the problems came from not understanding the language properly at this point (I certainly am very aware of the level of confusion that people have over fixed-point, which is one of the reasons I wrote the Ada 9X special report -- Joe I recommend reading this for a better perspective on the issues). As for your comments on portability being deliberate irony, I have no way of telling which of your dubious statements are intended as irony and which are serious :-) :-)