From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,40f30b718615e7f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: ObjectAda warning message ?
Date: 1997/12/02
Message-ID: <dewar.881081456@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 294568508
References: <881078602.5575@dejanews.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 881081558 1526 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


anders asks

<<Warning: line 269 col 4 LRM:13.3(16), Object does not have a meaningful
address, returning a null address

This message is repeated 11 times and points to a begin statement.

Any idea what this is about?
>>

With no more information, such as the object in question, about the best
guess one can make is that you applied the Address attribute to an object
that does not have a meaningful address!

The extent to which people expect readers of this group to be telepathic
and guess what code they submitted to the compiler always amazes me!