From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107079,183ebe04e93f0506 X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,183ebe04e93f0506 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: fixed point vs floating point Date: 1997/11/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 293046883 References: <65846t$4vq$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> <65c58j$1302@mean.stat.purdue.edu> Distribution: inet X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 880599089 31538 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,sci.math.num-analysis Date: 1997-11-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Joe said <> It would also be a good think if Ada could magically write your program for you :-) There is no free lunch when it comes to being careful with fixed-point scaling. To expect Ada83 to somehow solve this problem automatically sounds a bit naive, or let's at least say over-optimistic. <> SOunds like you had the wrong "Ada experts" or the wrong compilers, or both. Many people used fixed-point in Ada very successfully in the early days (I am really thinking specifically of the Alsys compiler here, since I was working for Alsys at the time).