From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d861a3fe9d7fc423
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 Modular Types Question 4.5.1(2)
Date: 1997/11/26
Message-ID: <dewar.880591890@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 293021396
References: <vch4t4ztzb3.fsf@yertle.htc.honeywell.com>
 <EK9KtM.F6w.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 880591961 28962 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Gordon's example is clearly illegal, and GNAT correctly diagnoses it:

test_example.adb:7:10: operator for type "Unsigned_Byte" defined at example.ads:
3 is not directly visible
test_example.adb:7:10: use clause would make operation legal