From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,702da61d55762f7b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT for an unsupported Unix-system? Date: 1997/11/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 290343775 References: <618.253T1150T10101574@cs.tu-berlin.de> <87zpn5666i.fsf@mihalis.i-have-a-misconfigured-system-so-shoot-me> <1630.259T1446T2081822@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 879823384 9797 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-11-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> This solution is certainly *simpler* than writing a "small subset compiler in C", since it requires zero work. Writing that small subset compiler in C is a FAR bigger task than you think, a few person years of work I would guess, GNAT does not use all of Ada 95, but it uses a very large subset. The real point is that in practice, even if you don't know enough to build a cross-compiler, someone somewhere has the knowledge and hardware to do so, and in practice versions of GNAT have appeared pretty easily. Also, to think that ./configure would ever be enough is ignoring the runtime library issue. Porting the entire runtime library is not a trivial task, and if you don't know enough to build a cross-compiler, you probably won't succeed with the runtime (let alone the full tool chain including gdb).