From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1d73eeed8d5628e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Fixed Point Range Date: 1997/10/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 285770789 References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 877883252 32303 (None) 128.122.140.58 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew Heany says <> The above output is correct, i.e. it is consistent with one of several possible sets of output permitted by the RM in this case. <> You read the RM wrong, it explicitly permits 255.0 in this case, with exactly this situation in mind. <> Your output is correct Incidentally, I suggest that if you are interested in finding out more about fixed point, you will find it helpful to read the special issue report I did for the SEI on this subject during the Ada 9x development.