From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5052684d3523ff1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.07 MsDos/DJGPP bug report to whom?
Date: 1997/10/22
Message-ID: <dewar.877577170@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 285026109
References: <swhalenEIFp53.946@netcom.com>
 <62lnnk$gv2@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 877577246 23705 (None) 128.122.140.58
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Thomas Koenig says

<<The main problem of porting GNAT to egcs is the lack of a good test
suite.  Anybody care to donate one? :-)>>

What a totally bizarre question ... the answer of course is to use the
publicly available ACVC suite. What is surprising is that the people 
working on this, who presumably should know *something* about Ada,
are unaware of this suite!