From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract)
Date: 1997/09/18
Message-ID: <dewar.874578339@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 273563578
References: <EGBGIL.C6I@ecf.toronto.edu> <EGML70.5w4@syd.csa.com.au>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Don said

<<Frankly, if I were to have forced dependency ordering inflicted on me but
could choose which scheme, I would choose *reverse* dependency ordering.
At least then I could read listings in a sensible order - from high-level to
low-level.>>

Can you clarify your experience with Ada here. it is sounding more and more
as though you are talking from imagination rather than experience.