From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ccb1f2c935939530 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT Compiler-Bug? Date: 1997/09/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 271583083 References: <5v3k78$dva$3@ubnnews.unisource.ch> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Stefan says <> There is no problem here. The code you quote is illegal, your fix is the appropriate fix, and GNAT 3.05 had a bug, it did not detect the illegality, and this bug was fixed nearly a year ago.