From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,896d86ef3723978c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: maintenance of overriding subprograms Date: 1997/09/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 271466250 References: <340C2EA5.B9F@gsfc.nasa.gov> <340DCE1D.6C5F@bix.com> <5v3dlu$pgu$1@miso.it.uq.edu.au> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Dan says <> Although there is no one authority for American spelling that is definitive, the spelling with Z is universal in the US. In England, there is one authority, the OED, and as we have discussed before in this newsgroup, the OED ONLY permits the spelling with the Z, and does not recognize the spelling with an S. This is the case, despite the fact that many Englishmen would swear that British English requires an S. Thus it is not good enough for someone from Australia to merely claim that this is the standard Australian English spelling, you need to cite some appropriate authority. All of which of course is besides the original point, which is that in both England and Australia, and who knows where else, people do indeed spell it with an S, and get no initialization (or finalization) as a result, which can be quite a surprise. In fact on our list to do with GNAT is always to warn if a primitive operation is defined on a controlled type with the names Initialise or Finalise if the profile matches that of the Z-equivalents.