From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,896d86ef3723978c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: maintenance of overriding subprograms Date: 1997/09/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270007206 References: <340C2EA5.B9F@gsfc.nasa.gov> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Actually I think a warning would be in order if a primitive procedure of a derived type matches the name (but not the signature) of a procedure of its parent.