From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad4aec717fd8556e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: 'size attribute inheritance Date: 1997/08/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 263784079 References: <33ECF679.4B5D@lmco.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew says <> There is no possible justification for such a rule (in caps or otherwise) in my opinion. Sure you have to be careful to know what you are doing, but this rule is entirely unsupportable. What is important is to use appropriate representation clauses and pragmas. If this is done, the above rule is not helpful.